OUR OBJECTIVES ARE:
27TH MARCH 2017
AGM followed by
"Ladycross Nature Reserve"
The history of the site, its development as a nature reserve and an introduction to its ecology and wildlife.
Please note that this meeting will be held in PONTELAND SOCIAL CLUB,
Merton Way, Ponteland, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE20 9PX starting at 7.30pm
(Entry free to members. Guests are welcome and are invited to make a donation of £2 towards expenses)
Ponteland Town Council has managed to secured extensions of time from
NCC for making comments on the following applications:
"Weapons of Mass Construction"?
Proposals for a huge extension of Ponteland
What will Greater Ashingtonshire do to us next?
Core Strategy Pre-Submission Draft - Proposed Major Modifications
This covers a set of eleventh-hour modifications which include all necessary references to the “Dissington Garden Village” so that this can be included in future house building.
Commenting is all very prescribed: you are only able to challenge
what is written in the document on the basis that it doesn’t comply with one or more of the following three
Specifically, you must challenge the deletions and/or additions which have been made to the previous Core Strategy document. These are identified by the deletions being crossed through and additions being underlined.
To help you with this, NCC are providing a drop-in session where you can discuss it all in the Memorial Hall between 2.00 and 7.00pm on Wednesday the 7th of December.
The Town Council and the Library (now in the Leisure Centre) both have paper copies of this document in their offices which you can look at any time they are open. There are also standard Forms to fill in to return your comments (one for each comment)
If you have a computer it is easiest to comment on line; to access the document and respond on line Click Here. For this method of response you must Log In and Register before you can comment.
Alternatively you can write a letter and send it by post or email it, but don’t forget that every item on which you comment must be identified by the Reference Number such as, for example: FMAJ/09/06, Para. 9.34A.
To respond by Email, use: PlanningStrategy@northumberland.gov.uk
Or by Post, use: Planning and Housing Policy Team, Northumberland County Council, County Hall, Morpeth, Northumberland, NE61 2EF.
All responses must be received by the County Council by the 23rd of December 2016 at 4.00pm.
Responses, by letter or email about the Bridleway and/or the Neighbourhood Plan should be sent to: Ponteland Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group, c/o Ponteland Town Council, Unit 1 Meadowfield Court, Ponteland NE20 9SD.
Or, by email to: email@example.com
Please respond by mid-day on Friday the 16th of December.
Ponteland Neighbourhood Plan.
A dedicated band of volunteers has been diligently beavering away on the Ponteland Neighbourhood Plan ever since 2013.
Neighbourhood Planning is a community right which was introduced with the Localism Act 2011, and the Neighbourhood Plan Group now needs to have confirmation that our Community at large substantially agrees with what it has done.
You can see a paper copy of it in the Town Council’s Offices at the address above on weekdays between 9:30am and 12:30pm or view, or download, the document on the Ponteland Neighbourhood Plan website.
The Bridleway is part of the Local Green Spaces designation, which the Civic Society has helped to specify, and such a status can be nearly as powerful as the Green Belt. The Bridleway in question is that part of the old railway line that crosses Callerton Lane and goes on to cross Rotary Way and beyond.
The County Council have ideas about diverting it to facilitate their plans to move the Schools and Leisure Centre, but it is now part of an established footpath, and the Neighbourhood Plan Group would like to see it stay that way. Wide community support for this view would be extremely useful, so if you have ever enjoyed walking on this pleasant rural track (or might do so, or would like to be able to) could you please write and say so
"Dissington Garden Village"
Proposals for a huge extension of Ponteland
"Lugano have submitted an expression of interest to the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) requesting that the ‘Dissington Village’ proposal receives Government approval. The DCLG decision is due to be announced around the 5th December – NCC have issued a statement stating that if DCLG do not approve the scheme they will push ahead with it through the Core Strategy. Both ourselves and the Green Belt Group will be issuing guidance on how to respond to the Core Strategy modifications soon after this."
Several people received an invitation from the Prince’s Foundation seeking – at rather short notice –their attendance at a Public Meeting on the evening of Sunday the 11th of September. This concerned a proposed “Dissington Garden Village” and was held at the DoubleTree Hotel at Newcastle Airport. Yes, it genuinely does came from Prince Charles’ organisation but originated from Northumberland County Council, with the backing of Lugano. The likely objective was to soften the local population to the proposed building of houses on the Dissington Estate, in response to the Government's "Locally-Led Garden Villages, Towns and Cities" scheme, and to tick the "consultation" box necessary for such a bid. The area comprises land immediately to the north and west of Ponteland (i.e. Darras Hall) bounded on the north by the Small Burn, to north-east by the A696 and to the west as far as Dissington Hall and beyond (all Green Belt). This latest proposal has been described as “Birney Hill x10” and you can see why by looking at the Map below; the part of the Dissington Estate we are talking about is coloured red.
The initial meeting was followed by three all-day closed sessions on the 12th, 13th and 14th of September to which personal invitations were issued and were followed by a wrap-up Public Meeting on the evening of Monday the 26th of September. The opaque title of the whole process is “Enquiry by Design” which is not a methodology but turns out to be the name of a subdivision of the Prince’s Foundation. The operation of the sessions has been subcontracted to a consultancy named "Local Dialogue" who specialise in “Stakeholder Engagement”. They boast that “we know how to consult on, or communicate, complex projects successfully – to often sceptical stakeholders.” The person in charge of the Ponteland presentations is a Mr. Will Rogers, who is a graduate in Politics but appears to have no current qualifications in Planning or Architecture.
We thought that anyone who attends these meetings will be seen as supporting the proposals and we advised our members not to go. Past experience suggests that 95% opposition will be reported as if it were a “constructive meeting” and referred to much later as part of a successful “consultation” – but the majority community view will be effectively ignored. On the other hand, non-attendance could be interpreted as lack of concern, so we need to explain why we are not attending. At a joint meeting on the 5th of September our view was shared with other local groups, bodies and representatives. It was agreed that we, with the support of our MP and Councilors, would make a joint response saying that this proposal has no community support whatsoever and therefore we will not be attending any presentations or workshops. The joint respnse can be viewed by clicking here.
All this has provided an opportunity for Lugano because the Government has requested offers from Local Authorities for twelve “Garden Villages” across the Country. The basic requirements for the offers are summarized as follows:
Lugano’s proposals do not comply with all the Government’s terms; the whole exercise is probably a precursor of, and justification for, the release of green belt land by NCC for future house building by Lugano, probably to be marketed as a “Garden Village”, and potentially over the whole Dissington Estate. There will no doubt be various cash incentives, as we have seen before. The planned meetings are not only an attempt at large-scale manipulation of opinion but are intended to provide evidence of prior consultation, as in (3) above.
The whole community is suffering from “Consultation Fatigue” – we have had 11 significant consultations since 2012 and even more major modifications are scheduled for the Core Strategy. Added to that – controversial proposals for new schools to be shared with a rebuilt Leisure Centre have left the whole Town of Ponteland in confusion and with very little faith left in the County Council.
WHAT YOU CAN DO
If you agree with the above then write to Guy Opperman MP, putting it in your own words and whatever detail you think fit. Circulate copies to me and our local County Councillors – Peter Jackson, Richard Dodd, Eileen Armstrong and Veronica Jones; We will forward them for you if necessary.
Guy’s postal address is: The House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA and his email address is: firstname.lastname@example.org. (Email is the preferred means of communication.)
Northumberland County Council Background.
On Tuesday 12th July Northumberland County Council's Cabinet considered proposals for a 'Garden Village' on the Dissington Estate.
They resolved to accept Officers' recommendations that
The report noted that:
Leisure Centre Consultation
This consultation finished on 11th August 2016. The consultation document can be accessed on Northumerland's website here.
This consultation only really covered the facilities to be provided and not the location and integration with schools requiring use of greenbelt land. It tried to suggest that this has all been agreed as part of the schools consultation but that is not true.
The document also confirmed that public access will be limited during the school day. It is silent on what happens to accomodate schoolextra-curricular sports sessions.
The consultation document can also be accessed
on our own website
Re-think on Schools' Location included in School Organisation consultation
On Friday 18th March Northumberland County Council launched a consultation on proposals for a change from the 3-Tier to a 2-Tier school organisation in Ponteland.
As part of this consultation a map has emerged showing the schools sharing the current Leisure Centre site with whatever Leisure Facilities are provided Click here to view this map. The map shows an area significantly reduced from that currently occupied by the leisure centre and schools and is silent on housing proposals
In a further development Ponteland Middle School, which was threatened with closure under the proposals, has applied for and received approval for becoming an academy school. With this status Northumberland County Council is obliged to grant the school a 125 year lease on its current site.
A further phase of consultation began on the 15th June and closed on Wednesday 27th July.
Click here to visit Northumerland's consultation page.
The following documents can also be downloaded from our own
site but be aware that these may not always be up to date.
Brief guide to the major modifications consultation
The Proposed Major Modifications to be commented on.(June 2016)
Proposed Minor Modifications (For Information Only) and
The Full Draft as Modified (For Information Only).
The modified greenbelt plans for Ponteland show loss of greenbelt for housing to the east of Willow Way, mixed use of the triangle of land between Rotary Way and Ponteland Road (with the beige area 'safeguarded' for future use) and employment use at Prestwick, abutting the airport.
The Listed Buildings of Ponteland Photographed 2015
Draft "Local List"
A Draft “Local List” of buildings, open spaces or other local features – not otherwise formally Listed – has been drawn up for possible incorporation into the emerging Neighbourhood Plan for Ponteland.Do you have any comments or proposed additions? Click here to view or download the draft list. Comments may be submitted to email@example.com
Pre-emptive Library Move?
Northumberland County Council intend to move the library operation away from Thornhill Road, to the Leisure Centre in the near future. Click here to view Northumberland's Press Release.
Callerton Lane Landscape Study
The Society has produced a Landscape Study concentrating on the eastern side of Callerton Lane. We believe that this landscaping makes a huge contribution to the rural feel of Ponteland. This study may be useful background reading before the Drop-in Session and before responding to the Ponteland Proposals Consultation.
The study can be downloaded by clicking here (8MB).
Requirements for Conservation Areas
There are legal requirements for Conservation Areas and information can be found on the Historic England website.
Older information can be found in our Archive Area click here to view.
Disclaimer: Information is provided in good faith. Ponteland Civic Society uses reasonable endeavours to check the accuracy of information published or made available on this website. You should note however that the Society does not warrant that such information will be error free. Third party information included may not always reflect the views of the Society.
|Meeting Programme||Contact Us||Membership Form||Greenbelt and Core Strategy||Web Links|
|What are Civic Societies?||Information||Archive|
Site last updated 18th March 2017